The questionnaire contained 3 parts. Region I integrated issues out of socio-demographic research (age, amount of knowledge, parity, familial income, industry, current relationship standing, sexual activity, reputation for HPV vaccination, and you will history of unusual cervical cancer tumors evaluating).
Part II composed of 6 questions about the goal women who will likely be screened, decades first off, regularity, years or conditions to stop away from tests, and techniques of evaluating. Just the professionals that has have you ever heard regarding HPV create proceed to help you Region III and this assessed information about HPV from their style of (oncogenic otherwise low-oncogenic), mode from getbride.org find ud her indication and prevention.
Ahead of the analysis, the newest survey away from part II and you will area III from inside the Thai variation have been contemplated, discussed, and you will revised up until consensus certainly one of 20 boffins who have been all the gynecologic oncologists (some were article writers various other synchronous knowledge). The professionals rated all of 19 concerns just like the often ‘relevant’ or ‘perhaps not relevant’. The thing-top Posts Legitimacy Directory (I-CVI) is determined per product, and Posts Legitimacy Index (CVI) are determined by firmly taking an average proportion from fourteen questions relating to understanding of cervical malignant tumors assessment and you may 5 questions relating to HPV. The brand new CVI was step one for elements of the new questionnaire (S1 Dining table). The fresh new precision is examined in the 29 feminine with the same attribute since the members. This new Cronbach’ alpha coefficients towards reliability was 0.819 to own knowledge about cervical disease screening and you may 0.907 for knowledge about HPV.
For the big date from scheduled colposcopy, the analysis assistant given advice of one’s investigation towards the women whom came across addition requirements. The women whom agreed to take part provided composed advised consent and you can answered the fresh questionnaire alone themselves prior to continuing to help you colposcopy.
Data built-up because of it study were socio-demographic study (Part We of your questionnaire), experience in cervical malignant tumors examination (Part II), and you can experience in HPV (Part III).
New responses of real information in the cervical cancer tumors evaluation and HPV have been assessed because of the for every product just before scoring categorization. Correct address was obtained because the step 1 while ‘wrong and you will being unsure of answer’ try scored 0.
Off fourteen inquiries from cervical disease evaluating, female whoever get was ? ten was basically arbitrarily classified while the that have ‘a beneficial knowledge’ normally was in fact considered as with “bad degree”. Getting experience with HPV, female whose address is ‘never ever heard about HPV’ had been omitted regarding investigation away from HPV degree.
Off 5 concerns, feminine whoever get have been ? 3 was considered as which have ‘an effective knowledge of HPV’ usually since the ‘not-good knowledge’. Regarding 19 questions, women whose get was indeed ? thirteen have been categorized because with ‘an excellent total knowledge’ or else just like the ‘not good total knowledge’.
Every study was built-up inside the an electronic databases and assessed having fun with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to research market investigation and you may was indeed described since amounts having payment, indicate which have fundamental departure otherwise median which have diversity. The latest association between for each adjustable and you may degree get have been analyzed playing with simple linear regression. Exploratory design was created during the multivariable research and all details potentially associated with the data rating. This new thought amount of statistical benefit try an effective p-property value 0.05 otherwise less.
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>